Yet, with the emotional element provided by real, human journalists and news anchors, there is very little chance for abuse.
Are automatrons real free#
Then the officials would be free to report – and do – what they want. It would be much easier to use robots to “feed” the people what the government wants them to hear. Xinhua’s news anchors are widely seen as the Communist Party’s mouthpiece. In addition, AI anchors could be controlled by outside forces. For the broadcaster, all these facts are bad news – they will lose viewers and advertisers. Also, real journalists have good decision-making skills and can react quickly to any situation. Ralph Breaks the Internet's production team explain how cities like Shanghai and New York inspired the design of the world wide web cityĪnother problem is that AI news anchors would present disturbing stories, for example, about genocide or murder, with a complete lack of emotion that would shock the viewers. As such, it’s easy to see how robots could harm the very purpose of having news anchors – getting viewers interested in what’s happening in their country and around the world. Their performance is very boring compared to the way humans present news.Īccording to UCLA psychology professor Albert Mehrabian, 38 per cent of communication is based on voice and tone, something that AI fails to achieve. For example, China’s Xinhua News Agency recently unveiled what it called the world’s first English news anchors powered by artificial intelligence. Therefore, I believe that robots cannot, should not, and will not replace human news anchors.įirst of all, AI anchors may wear suits but they will never have the voice, facial expressions and actions of a real person. We live in a world where AI has increasingly come under fire for its failure to replace humans in more meaningful tasks. Industry leaders get real about future career opportunities for young people in technology, robots vs humans, and women in STEM Meanwhile, some real-life news anchors may take up jobs they never thought they would – like being a business executive or chef.
We should embrace AI and work with robots to ensure a prosperous future. Humans will have to be inventive to keep up with the challenges posed by robots. Perhaps the growth of the AI labour force will change the way the job market functions. In fact, new technology can inspire humans to reach levels that they could be proud of.
We live in amazing times – we have driverless cars and drones delivering packages. Now the same thing is happening with technology. Many years ago, when factories were set up, individual craftsmen were put out of business. They can be created to look and act like humans, and cover stories anywhere, anytime.Ĭan food be grown on Mars? Nasa is working with Dutch researchers to find outĬritics will say this will lead to many people losing their jobs. With automated news anchors, we would be able to receive news really fast: someone could just type the copy into the system, keeping the public well-informed at all times.Īlso, unlike humans, robots can work 24 hours a day. But I think using robots as news anchors is sensible and harmless, and will cut costs and improve efficiency.
Are automatrons real tv#
To those whose exposure to AI is limited to cheesy action movies and TV shows, they might think that robots are “evil” or “scary”, or even worse: that they are capable of taking over the world.
0 kommentar(er)
